Unfair to call opposition to project as simply NIMBY

I am writing in response to the article First Street condo units approved, in the Friday, March 27 issue of the Peninsula News Review.

I am writing in response to the article First Street condo units approved, in the Friday, March 27 issue of the Peninsula News Review.

I live in First Place Estates immediately to the south of the proposed development. In none of the communications that I have had with those living in our development and in that to the immediate north of the proposed development, did I hear any objections to putting eight units on the now-empty lot. I did not run across anyone who was opposed to development.

The two main reasons for objection in this case were the increased density, and the repercussions of that, and the nature of the architecture of the planned building,

Councillor Fallott reportedly said the objections were “just in the neighbourhood.” That is not surprising. What other residents of Sidney would be motivated to object to such a local project?

Don’t we, as taxpaying citizens of Sidney, have a right to protect the ambiance and character of our neighbourhoods? Or are we expected to bow to the actions of our elected officials assuming that they know what is best for us?

Fallott was also cited as stating that objections were just “voices in the neighbourhood” and “not about the project itself.” Such a statement says to me that she thinks the objectors are merely interested in their own concerns and have no appreciation or concern for the Town’s overall needs, or, to quote Mayor Price, “what the OCP asks for.” The tenor of her comments seems to imply that it is invalid to object to a development on the grounds that it detracts from one’s neighbourhood.

In this regard, I wonder who initiated the “NIMBY” term in the article. Generally, in our society, that expression has taken on a very negative connotation but it is just not the case here when it comes to development. To conclude that those dissenting citizens were not opposed to development in general, “just the one next door” is completely uncalled for, especially when two of such residents were singled out as examples.

Council members have expressed a desire for input from the residents of Sidney, ostensibly to get an idea of how changes proposed by the Town will impact them. In this case they got that feedback, not just from a few, but many citizens in the immediate neighbourhood. It appears that four of the members of council chose to disregard such strong input and perhaps even dismissed it by invoking the NIMBY concept.

It appears to me that we MAY have been listened to by them, but were not really heard. To ignore, or worse still, discount public input by maintaining that any objections heard are merely NIMBY, and that we have little or no regard for the Town’s needs, is unacceptable from our elected representatives.

John Bardsley, Sidney

Just Posted

Friends, family remember Dan Sealey, stepson of Minister of Agriculture, in private gathering

Lana Popham confirmed Sealey died of an accidental drug overdose earlier this month at age 23

PHOTOS: Uptown lights up the holiday season

Annual event drew crowd of all ages for parade and Christmas tree lighting

New figures show City of Victoria spent $30,000 to remove Macdonald statue

Contentious decision sparked controversy, apology from mayor

High school graduation rates on the rise in Greater Victoria

High school completion up from 71 to 86.8 per cent over 10 years

Mommy’s Inside Voice: A little piece of you

Mommy’s Inside Voice is a biweekly column by Amie Jay, a local mother of three

Unique technology gives children with special needs more independent play

UVic’s CanAssist refined seven prototypes aided by $1.5M government contribution

Greater Victoria holiday craft fair roundup for Nov. 16 to 18

Check off all of the items on your shopping list at these great events

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers wanted list for the week of Nov. 14

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers is seeking the public’s help in locating the… Continue reading

High-end B.C. house prices dropping, but no relief at lower levels

But experts say home ownership remains out of reach for many for middle- and lower-income families

Worker killed in collision at B.C. coal mine

Vehicle collision occurred at approximately 10:45 a.m. this morning

B.C. asking for tips on ‘dirty money’ in horse racing, real estate, luxury cars

Action follows a Peter German report on money laundering in B.C. casinos

Canadian dead more than a week after plane crash in Guyana: Global Affairs

Global Affairs said it couldn’t provide further details on the identity of the Canadian citizen

Children between 6 and 9 eligible for $1,200 RESP grant from province

BC Ministry of Education is reminding residents to apply before the deadline

Privacy concerns over credit card use for legal online pot purchases

Worries follow privacy breaches at some Canadian cannabis retailers

Most Read