Article on Coun. Hailey doesn’t tell whole story

Story of Buckley the horse didn't present things as Sidney councillor sees them

Re: The good, the bad and the horse (News, Dec. 14)

I’d like to refute some information in the article.

First, I did ask then-mayor Jon Lefebure and the clerk Mark Ruttan before I purchased Buckley and they did not express any concerns at the time. They have admitted this in public.

The assertion that I contravened the bylaw has never been proven, nor has it been shown that I was keeping a “farm animal.”

The term farm animal is not defined in the bylaw, but the common definition is an animal kept for profit or use.

A miniature horse is commonly defined as a companion animal or a pet, which is permitted under the bylaw.

It is good the article points out the cost to the taxpayers of North Cowichan; but it is misleading to attribute those costs to me or my actions as it was council’s decision to take legal action against me – a case that they never successfully concluded and have never shown to have any merit.

You also failed to note that the legal action resulted in a significant cost to me and damage to my reputation, which your article has perpetuated.

Melissa Hailey

Sidney councillor

Be Among The First To Know

Sign up for a free account today, and receive top headlines in your inbox Monday to Saturday.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up
Pop-up banner image