Letters to the Editor

Columnist articulates pipeline issue clearly

Re: Separating oil from manure (B.C. Views, Sept. 5)

Kudos to Tom Fletcher. Finally, some clear facts regarding pipelines and oil spills. I sincerely hope that those opposing the pipeline will respond with substance rather than the emotional hype and paranoia of total environmental disasters.

A friend of mine who is a member of one of the First Nations that live along the proposed Enbridge route told me that his opposition to the pipeline is based on the thickness, or rather the “thin-ness,” of the proposed pipe. He understands from information he has received from his elders that Enbridge acknowledged they have not met specifications that could prevent potential leaks.

So far, that is the only rational objection I have heard to oppose the existing proposal, and it is not insurmountable. Make the pipe thicker.

Please, someone give me factual reasons why I should not support this project.

Eli W. Fricker

North Saanich

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

One last holdup on B.C. railway tracks
 
Windy fun at Columbia Beach
 
Police await autopsy results of suspicious death investigation
Editorial cartoon: Dec. 12
 
Time for truth in B.C. treaty talks
 
‘Social justice’ as student indoctrination

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.