News

Peninsula Co-op must hand out members' contact info if requested: judge

Randy Pearson at his Saanich farm. Pearson recently won a B.C. Supreme Court case which could force Peninsula Co-op to release the contact information of its 56,000 members for certain purposes. - Erin Cardone/News staff
Randy Pearson at his Saanich farm. Pearson recently won a B.C. Supreme Court case which could force Peninsula Co-op to release the contact information of its 56,000 members for certain purposes.
— image credit: Erin Cardone/News staff

A Peninsula Co-op member who fought – and won – to have members’ contact information distributed said it’s a victory for democracy.

“The members are going to benefit from this,” said Randy Pearson, the Saanich farmer and Co-op member who took the issue to Supreme Court in January 2011. “The more you engage people in the policies of the Co-op and what the future of the enterprise can be, the more people are going to be paying attention and the better the Co-op will be, the more accountable the directors will be to the membership.

“That’s the one underlying element of the Co-op, is it’s meant to be run by the membership.”

In a Jan. 25 ruling, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Geoffrey Gaul ruled the Co-operative Association Act says members’ contact info can be released by request, if the requester plans to use it for corporate purposes.

For Peninsula Co-op general manager Ron Heal, it means a breach of privacy for its 56,000 members.

“We take the privacy of our members’ information very seriously,” he said. “It was our opinion and belief that the Personal Information [Protection] Act prevented us from releasing that information to members. We felt that the two acts contradicted each other.”

Under the Co-op Act, corporate purposes include “[influencing] the voting of members, investment shareholders or debentureholders of the association at any meeting.”

Pearson’s application to the court stems from a 2009 election for the Co-op’s directors, during the time the Co-op was applying to build a grocery store on land it owns on West Saanich Road.

“It was an absolute chaotic situation and probably the most undemocratic meeting I’d seen in my life. I was just appalled,” Pearson said. “I left there and I thought, you can’t do this stuff, it’s so bad.”

Pearson launched an arbitration soon after and in early 2010, arbitrator Jakob de Villiers nullified the 2009 election, and ordered a re-election.

“I’m a member of this Co-op and i want to speak out against [the development]. That’s what brought me to the [election meeting],” Pearson said. “But when I saw how it was run and when I saw the general manager get up on the podium and say vote for the incumbents … it was so wrong and so bush league. That’s what motivated me.”

Heal couldn’t confirm whether Peninsula Co-op would appeal Gaul’s decision.

“We’re going to assess our options on how we can continue to keep that information secure. I don’t know right now where that avenue’s going to take us.”

In signing a Peninsula Co-op membership application, members agree their information can be used for “communicating with you regarding your membership or other matters of concern to the Co-op and its members” and “meeting legal and regulatory requirements.”

Pearson said he is requesting the membership list be released to him.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Aug 29 edition online now. Browse the archives.